Climate Change
I want to testify today about what I believe is a planetary emergency - a
crisis that threatens the survival of our civilization and the
habitability of the Earth.
Al Gore, testifying on the impact of global warming before US congress.
Africa: By 2020, between 75 and 250 million people are projected to be
exposed to increased water stress due to climate
IPCC (International Panel on Climate Change) Fourth Assessment
Summary for Policymakers.
Climate change poses clear, catastrophic threats. We may not agree on the
extent, but we certainly can’t afford the risk of inaction.
Rupert Murdoch
The current level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is 385 parts per
million. This compares with a figure of some 315ppm around
1960 .... Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas that can persist for hundreds of
years in the atmosphere, absorbing infrared radiation and heating the atmosphere
....Most predictions suggest that globaltemperatures will rise by 2C to 4C over
the century.
Robin McKie, Climate Change in Figures, the Observer.
The last time the world was 4-5 degrees above where we are now was 30-50
million years ago, when much of the planet was a
swampy forest .... the location of many species, including humans, would be
radically different and many would not survive ..
Sir Nicholas Stern, author of the Stern Report on Climate Change, in his
book: Blueprint for a Safer Planet (Bodley Head).
Scientists say continued emissions will cause the planet to heat up
further. To work out how much, they use computer models based on the programs
used to predict the weather. These models are not perfect, and struggle to
simulate some features of the climate system such as clouds. To get around this,
the scientists run many different versions and pool the results. The computer
models predict that if emissions continue to rise at the present rate, average
temperatures will most likely increase by 4C by 2100. There are uncertainties,
though - for example, the planet’s oceans, forests and soils could release their
massive stocks of carbon as the world warms, leading to much greater temperature
rises than human emissions alone would cause.
David Adams, Environment Correspondent, the Guardian.
The phrase “tipping point” is heard a lot more from scientists. This is
where a small amount of warming sets off unstoppable changes, for example the
melting of the ice caps. Once the temperature rises a certain amount then all
the ice caps will melt. The tipping point in many scientists’ view is the 2C
rise that the EU has adopted as the maximum limit that mankind can risk. Beyond
that, as unwelcome changes in the earth’s reaction to extra warmth continue, it
is theoretically possible to trigger runaway climate change, making the earth’s
atmosphere so different that most of life would be threatened.
Paul Brown, author of Global Warming: The Last Chance for Change
By the time global temperatures reach four degrees, much of humanity will
be short of water for drinking and irrigation: glaciers in the Andes and
Himalayas, which feed river systems on which tens of millions depend, will have
melted, and their rivers will be
seasonally running dry. Whole weather systems like the Asian monsoon (which
supports 2 billion people) may alter irrevocably.
Deserts will have spread into Mediterranean Europe, across most of southern
Africa and the western half of the United States.
Higher northern latitudes will be plagued with regular flooding. Heatwaves of
unimaginable ferocity will sear continental landscapes: the UK would face the
kind of summer temperatures found in northern Morocco today. The planet would be
in the throes of a mass extinction of natural life approaching in magnitude that
at the end of the Cretaceous period, 65m years ago, when more than half of
global biodiversity was wiped out. Four degrees of warming would also cross many
of the “tipping points” which so concern climate scientists: the Amazon
rainforest would likely collapse and burn, as part of a massive further release
of carbon from terrestrial ecosystems – the reverse of the current situation,
where trees and soils absorb and store a good portion of our annual emissions.
Most of the Arctic permafrost will lie in the melt zone, and will be steadily
releasing methane, accelerating warming still further. The northern polar ice
cap will be a distant memory, and Greenland will be melting so rapidly that sea
level rise by the end of the century will be measured in metres rather than
centimetres.
Mark Lynas; author of Six Degrees (Harper Perennial).
Temperatures above 5 degrees would lead to human hardship and mass
migration on such a scale global turmoil would be inevitable.
Summer Arctic sea ice is disappearing more than 80 years ahead of IPCC
predictions.
The disturbing conclusion, documented in a paper I have written with
several of the world’s leading climate experts, is that the safe level of
atmospheric carbon dioxide is no more than 350ppm (parts per million)
and it may be less. Carbon dioxide amount is already 385ppm and rising
about 2ppm per year ....These conclusions are based on paleoclimate data showing
how the Earth responded to past levels of greenhouse gases and on observations
showing how the world is responding to today’s carbon dioxide amount. The
consequences of continued increase of greenhouse gases extend far beyond
extermination of species and future sea level rise .... We must draw down
atmospheric carbon dioxide to preserve the planet we know. A level of no more
than 350ppm is still feasible, with the help of reforestation and improved
agricultural practices, but just barely – time is running out.
In the journal Science in 2004, Oreskes published the results of a survey
of 928 papers on climate change published in peerreviewed journals between 1993
and 2003. She found that three-quarters of the papers either explicitly or
implicitly accepted the view expressed in the IPCC 2001 report that human
activities have had a major impact on climate change in the last 50 years, and
none rejected it.
It’s important to listen to what scientists have to say, even when it’s
inconvenient, especially when it’s inconvenient .
If global mean temperature increase is to be stabilized between 2.0-2.4°C,
then CO2 emissions must peak by 2015. The cost of
He [Nicholas Stern] argues that the world can cut emissions by 80% by 2050
by investing just 1% of GDP into transforming how we use and make electricity,
travel and live ....With startlingly simple measures like improving insulation
and recycling, energy efficiency can be improved.
Electric cars and cutting down on air travel will reduce emissions from travel,
industry can make massive cuts with changes to its manufacturing processes.
Governments can also invest in green technologies, while encouraging their
citizens to change their lifestyles through tax reform and education.
Can nine billion people be fed? Can we cope with the demands in the future
on water? Can we provide enough energy? Can we do it, all that, while
mitigating and adapting to climate change? And can we do all
that in 21 years time? That’s when these things are going to start
hitting in a really big way. We need to act now. We need
investment in science and technology, and all the other ways of
treating very seriously these major problems. 2030 is not very far away.
The issue of climate change is one that we ignore at our own peril. There
may still be disputes about exactly how much we’re contributing to the
warming of the earth’s atmosphere and how much is naturally
occurring, but what we can be scientifically certain of is that our
continued use of fossil fuels is pushing us to a point of no
return. And unless we free ourselves from a dependence on
these fossil fuels and chart a new course on energy in this country, we are
condemning future generations to global catastrophe.
Climate change should be seen as the greatest challenge to face man and
treated as a much bigger priority in the United Kingdom.
The blunt truth about the politics of climate change is that no country
will want to sacrifice its economy in order to meet this challenge, but all
economies know that the only sensible way of developing is to do it on a
sustainable basis.
There are blueprint solutions to the problems of climate change. We need
not despair or bury our heads. We have the technologies, market tools and
regulatory mechanisms available. The present crisis should be
seen as an opportunity for all to create a safer, cleaner and fairer planet.
It is not just up to the politicians to bring this
about, though. It is up to us. And now, as we approach the crucial
Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen in December, is the time to act.
Some Further Research:
Books:
Some Campaigns:
Sir Nicholas Stern, Blueprint for a Safer Planet (Bodley Head).
<
/p>
Public Interest Research Centre: Climate Safety
James Hansen, climate scientist and director of the Nasa Goddard Institute
for Space Studies
Royal Society; Facts and Fictions, Climate Change
President Barack Obama
IPCC Chairman, Mr Rajendra Pachauri
Louis Gray, Environment Correspondent, the Daily Telegraph
Prof John Beddington, UK Chief Scientist
Barack Obama
Prince Charles
Tony Blair
Peter Hudson, Rainbow Development in Africa.
carbontrust.org
ipcc.ch
metoffice.gov
reduceyourcarbonfootprint.com
Oliver Tickell: Kyoto 2
Chris Goodall: Ten Technologies to Save the Planet
1010uk.org
globalclimatecampaign.org
stopclimatechaos.org
350.org
campaigncc.org
christianaid.org